feat: Generate sharable link for code-explorer #49
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
✅ Deploy Preview for eslint-code-explorer ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
1 task
nzakas
reviewed
Oct 1, 2024
| set => ({ | ||
| tool: "ast", | ||
| setTool: tool => set({ tool }), | ||
| persist( |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Did you intend to have a second persist here?
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Prerequisites checklist
What is the purpose of this pull request?
Generate a shareable link for Code Explorer, similar to how ESLint Playground generates shareable links
What changes did you make? (Give an overview)
Utilized Zustand's built-in functions to handle the application state and automatically sync it with the URL hash. In this implementation, the custom hashStorage ensures that all state updates are directly reflected in the URL.
Is there anything you'd like reviewers to focus on?